This is a little absurd. A site that has the single purpose of picking on other people’s spelling and grammar errors decides to deride the correct use of a word simply because the author of the article has a limited vocabulary or can’t be bothered to use a dictionary to check things before he makes an ass of himself.
@ Cody’Lover and lol.
How does one describe someone who can go to the effort of writing a comment asking what something is but can’t be bothered to ask an on-line dictionary the same? It even explains it on Google you lazy buggers.
Thanks for visiting Funny Typos. Get your weekly fill of hilarious uses of English, Bad Grammar and Engrish that would make your grammar school English teacher cringe.
No tout? What’s tout??
i think it’s no touching rofl
This is a little absurd. A site that has the single purpose of picking on other people’s spelling and grammar errors decides to deride the correct use of a word simply because the author of the article has a limited vocabulary or can’t be bothered to use a dictionary to check things before he makes an ass of himself.
For American use http://dictionary.reference.com/
For English use http://www.merriam-webster.com/
@ Cody’Lover and lol.
How does one describe someone who can go to the effort of writing a comment asking what something is but can’t be bothered to ask an on-line dictionary the same? It even explains it on Google you lazy buggers.